Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2026-03-23 allowed

M/s. ABS Marine Services vs The Andaman and Nicobar Administration

Bench: 2 — J. B. Pardiwala, K. V. Viswanathan

In Brief

ABS Marine Services engaged by the Andaman & Nicobar Administration to man 17 vessels sued for recovery of ₹2,87,84,305 after M.V. Long Island was damaged allegedly due to the company's negligence. The contract contained two conflicting clauses: Clause 3.20 barred court and arbitration challenges to the Administration's recovery decision; Clause 3.22 provided broad arbitration for all disputes. An arbitral award favored the company. The High Court set aside it, holding the Administration's sole decision power under Clause 3.20 ousted the arbitrator's jurisdiction. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that Clause 3.20 cannot exclude arbitration when liability is genuinely disputed—only quantification in admitted breach cases may be excluded. The Court restored the award, reaffirming that no party can unilaterally decide its own breach when challenged, and that Rule of Law prevents total exclusion of legal remedies.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Contract Interpretation Arbitrability of Disputes Rule of Law Administrative Law Judicial Review of Awards

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login