Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-07-09 partly_allowed

M/S AL-CAN EXPORT PVT. LTD vs PRESTIGE H.M. POLYCONTAINERS LTD. & ORS

Bench: 2 — J. B. Pardiwala, Manoj Misra

In Brief

M/S AL-CAN Export Pvt. Ltd., which purchased a manufacturing property at public auction conducted by a Tahsildar under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, challenged the High Court's order setting aside the sale due to procedural violations. The Supreme Court held that writ courts under Article 226 are not bound by the Code of Civil Procedure's Order XXI Rule 90 and must focus on fairness and transparency in state-conducted auctions. The Court found gross violations of mandatory 30-day notice and possession-before-confirmation requirements, constituting illegality rather than mere irregularity. While affirming the High Court, the Court allowed the appellant in part, permitting it to retain the property upon depositing Rs 4 crore with the lender as full settlement.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Auction Law Code of Civil Procedure Constitutional Law Land Revenue Law Writ Jurisdiction Judicial Review Public Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login