Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-06-05 allowed

M/S. BALAJI TRADERS vs THE STATE OF U.P. & ANR

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Karol, Manoj Misra

In Brief

M/s. Balaji Traders sought to restore criminal proceedings against Sanjay Gupta, accused of threatening the complainant with a gun and demanding Rs. 5 lakhs monthly to allow continuation of business. The Trial Court issued summons under Section 387 IPC (putting person in fear of death or grievous hurt in order to commit extortion). The High Court quashed the proceedings, reasoning that since no money was actually delivered, extortion was not completed and Section 387 IPC could not apply. The Supreme Court held that Section 387 IPC criminalizes the process of putting someone in fear of death or grievous hurt to commit extortion, distinct from Section 384 IPC which addresses completed extortion. Delivery of property is not an essential ingredient of Section 387 IPC. The two essential ingredients—putting the complainant in fear of death and doing so to pressurize payment—were prima facie disclosed. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's quashing order, and restored proceedings to the Trial Court.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Penal Law Extortion Interpretation of Statutes Quashing of Proceedings

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login