Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-05-19 allowed

M/S GLOCK ASIA-PACIFIC LTD vs UNION OF INDIA

Bench: 3 — Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J.B. Pardiwala

In Brief

The Union of India and Glock Asia-Pacific Ltd. entered into a contract for supply of Glock pistols. When disputes arose, the applicant sought to appoint a retired High Court judge as sole arbitrator. The respondent objected, citing Clause 28 requiring appointment of a serving Ministry of Law officer. The Supreme Court held that such clause violates Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, which prohibits appointment of persons with relationships to the parties. A serving government employee cannot appoint another serving employee as sole arbitrator. Contracts in the President's name receive no exemption from statutory eligibility requirements. The Court appointed a retired Supreme Court judge as sole arbitrator instead.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Conflict of Interest Administrative Law Government Contracts Statutory Interpretation Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login