Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-08-20 allowed

M/S KUT ENERGY PVT.LTD vs THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran

In Brief

Kut Energy obtained a consortium loan to build a hydro-electric project. When the account became non-performing, the bank issued a Section 13(2) demand notice under the SARFAESI Act for over Rs.106 crores and proceeded with asset sale. The borrower offered One Time Settlement proposals and deposited Rs.40 crores with the High Court registry to establish good faith. After the High Court's writ petition was set aside by the Supreme Court and the settlement was rejected, the bank sought to appropriate the deposit towards loan dues. The Supreme Court held that deposits made to establish bona fides are neither secured assets nor secured debts under the SARFAESI Act, and cannot be appropriated. The bank has no general lien over court-registry deposits. The borrower was entitled to full refund of Rs.40 crores with accrued interest.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Secured Finance Debt Recovery SARFAESI Act Banking Regulation Civil Procedure Lien and Security Interests

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login