Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-01-02 allowed

M/S NARESH POTTERIES vs M/S AARTI INDUSTRIES AND ANOTHER

Bench: 2 — B.R. Gavai, K. V. Viswanathan

In Brief

M/s Naresh Potteries filed a cheque dishonor complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act through its manager Neeraj Kumar, who held a power of attorney from the proprietor. The High Court quashed the complaint, finding insufficient explicit averments of the manager's personal knowledge. The Supreme Court reversed this decision, holding that when a proprietorship files a Section 138 complaint through an authorized manager, the statutory requirements are satisfied if the complaint is filed in the payee's name and the supporting documents collectively show authorization and knowledge. The Court emphasized that such assertions need not follow rigid formulae but must be gathered contextually from the entire record. Triable issues of authorization and knowledge cannot justify summary quashing under Section 482; they are for determination during trial.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Negotiable Instruments Criminal Procedure Cheque Dishonor Power of Attorney Complaint Procedures

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login