Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-11-07 disposed

M/S SHAF BROADCAST PVT LTD vs DOORDARSHAN A CONSTITUENT OF PRASAR BHARTI

Bench: 3 — Uday Umesh Lalit, Indu Malhotra, Sanjiv Khanna

In Brief

A broadcasting company sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, after Doordarshan (a state-owned entity) failed to nominate its arbitrator in their commercial dispute. The Supreme Court appointed a retired Supreme Court judge as sole arbitrator, with the consent of all parties (modifying the original three-member tribunal agreement). The arbitration was directed to proceed at New Delhi as the seat, with the arbitrator required to complete proceedings within 12 months and make declarations of independence and impartiality. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Appointment of Arbitrator Procedural Law Commercial Dispute Resolution

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login