Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-09-09 disposed

M/s SITARAM ENTERPRISES vs PRITHVIRAJ VARDICHAND JAIN

Bench: 2 — J.K. Maheshwari, Rajesh Bindal

In Brief

M/s Sitaram Enterprises (landlord) filed contempt petitions against Prithviraj Vardichand Jain (tenant) for willfully violating a Supreme Court order to vacate shop and room premises by 6 March 2024. The tenant had lost eviction suits at trial and appellate stages, and the Supreme Court had dismissed his special leave petitions, granting nine months to vacate. Despite this order, the tenant failed to vacate, did not appear in court despite bailable and non-bailable warrants, and misled police about his whereabouts. The Court held him guilty of contempt, finding his non-compliance deliberate and willful. Rather than imprison him due to his advanced age and health condition, the Court ordered him to vacate within seven days and to reimburse state costs of execution.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Contempt of Court Civil Procedure Landlord and Tenant Eviction Compliance with Court Orders

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login