Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-09-19 allowed

M/S TECH SHARP ENGINEERS PVT. LTD vs SANGHVI MOVERS LIMITED

Bench: 2 — Indira Banerjee, J.K. Maheshwari

In Brief

A company hired a crane to another company for work at an oil refinery. When the hirer failed to pay the hire charges (first default in mid-2013), the company filed a winding-up petition in 2015. After the Insolvency Code came into force in December 2016, the company filed an insolvency petition in March 2018. The tribunal dismissed it as time-barred under the three-year limitation period (default occurred over three years before filing). The appellate tribunal reversed this, holding the pending winding-up petition was sufficient cause. The Supreme Court held that limitation runs from the date the default occurs, not from when the Code came into force. Pending parallel proceedings in a competent court do not extend limitation. The appeal was allowed and the appellate order set aside.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Limitation Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Winding Up

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login