Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-07-17 partly_allowed

M/S. ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD. & ANR vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS

Bench: 2 — A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari

In Brief

UltraTech Cement Limited sought to enforce a 75% sales tax subsidy under the Rajasthan Investment Promotion Scheme-2003 on the basis of alleged approval by a high-powered board (BIDI). The Supreme Court held that the company was entitled only to 50% subsidy. The Court found that while BIDI approved application of the scheme in 2006, it never specifically authorized 75% subsidy. The erroneous state committee decisions granting 75% were invalid. The Government properly exercised its revisional power to recover the 25% excess. However, the Court reduced the interest rate from 18% to 12% per annum as per the company's undertaking, since the excess subsidy resulted from administrative error, not breach by the company.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Fiscal Policy Tax Incentives Government Schemes Estoppel

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login