Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-20 dismissed

M/S WESTERN COALFIELDS LTD vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA

Bench: 2 — A.M. Khanwilkar, Ajay Rastogi

In Brief

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd., a buyer of conveyor belts, challenging rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty. The manufacturer had paid the duty under protest during a classification dispute that was later resolved in its favour. The Court held that while the six-month limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act does not apply to duty paid under protest, this exemption applies only to the person who actually paid the duty. A buyer claiming refund must comply with the six-month limitation from the date of purchase, regardless of the manufacturer's protest. The buyer's failure to file within six months rendered the claim time-barred and non-maintainable."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Excise Law Customs and Excise Refund of Duty Limitation Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login