Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-02-25 dismissed

M/S. ZEE TELEFILMS LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES LTD.) THROUGH AUTHORIZED SIGNATO vs SURESH PRODUCTIONS REP. BY ITS PARTNER DR. RAMA NAIDU S/O SRI NAIDU

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan, Navin Sinha

In Brief

Zee Telefilms assigned satellite broadcasting rights of 16 Hindi films to four persons nominated by M/s. N.S. Films for 9 years by deed dated 23.12.1994. In 2003, after receiving a legal notice from another party claiming rights to these films, Zee filed a suit seeking declaration and injunction. The trial court dismissed the suit as barred by limitation, but the High Court allowed the appeal. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court, holding that the cause of action arose only after the 9-year assignment period expired (22.12.2003), not when Zee learned of adverse claims in 1995 while rights were assigned away. The suit filed in 2003 was thus within the three-year limitation period.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Copyright Law Limitation Intellectual Property Copyright Infringement Assignment of Rights Cause of Action

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login