Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Wednesday, 23 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-12-15 allowed

Macquarie Bank Limited vs Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

Macquarie Bank Limited, a foreign bank, sought to initiate insolvency against a corporate debtor for non-payment of an operational debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The NCLAT rejected the application on two grounds: (i) absence of a certificate from a financial institution as required by Section 9(3)(c), and (ii) the demand notice was issued by a lawyer rather than the creditor itself. The Supreme Court held that Section 9(3)(c)'s certificate requirement is directory, not mandatory, as the Code permits proof of default through other documentary evidence. The Court also ruled that a lawyer may issue a demand notice and conduct insolvency proceedings on behalf of an operational creditor, as the word 'delivered' denotes agency, and lawyers have wide authority to represent clients under the Advocates Act. The appeals were allowed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency Law Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Corporate Insolvency Resolution Operational Creditors Civil Procedure Statutory Interpretation Advocates Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login