Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Wednesday, 23 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-20 allowed

Mahendra Singh Dhoni vs Yerraguntla Shyamsundar

Bench: 3 — Dipak Misra

In Brief

Mahendra Singh Dhoni filed a transfer petition seeking to move criminal proceedings from Anantpur, Andhra Pradesh to Bangalore, Karnataka. The complaint alleged that a magazine carried his photograph with a caption "God of Big Deals" that supposedly insulted religious sentiments, charging him under Section 295A IPC. The Supreme Court quashed the complaint against both Dhoni and the co-accused magazine editor, holding that the allegations failed to satisfy the essential ingredients of Section 295A, which requires deliberate and malicious intent to outrage religious feelings. The Court cautioned magistrates to carefully scrutinize complaints before issuing summons to ensure allegations meet statutory requirements and jurisdictional criteria.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Criminal Law Freedom of Religion Religious Sentiments Abuse of Process Magistrate Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login