Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-09-28 allowed

Maheshwar Tigga vs State of Jharkhand

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Maheshwar Tigga was convicted of rape under IPC Sections 376, 323, and 341 based on the prosecutrix's claim that the appellant had coerced her into a sexual relationship under a false promise of marriage. The Supreme Court allowed his appeal and acquitted him. The Court found that the four-year delay in lodging the FIR (just before the appellant's marriage to another woman), the prosecutrix's own admission during cross-examination that no forced incident had occurred, and her letters acknowledging the appellant's family's kindness, established that her consent was genuine and conscious—rooted in her deep emotional attachment—rather than fraudulently obtained or coerced. The evidence was insufficient to prove rape.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Rape and Sexual Consent Indian Penal Code Proof and Evidence Code of Criminal Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login