Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-05-19 partly_allowed

MAMTA DEVI & ORS vs THE RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR

Bench: 2 — J.K. Maheshwari, Aravind Kumar

In Brief

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment that had rejected a workmen's compensation claim as contested. The deceased, Vakil Choudhary, a truck driver, died in a 2011 road accident. His wife, son, and parents sought compensation. The Court held that merely filing a written statement does not make a case contested; active contestation is required. Since the insurer did not cross-examine witnesses, the claim was maintainable before the Deputy Labour Commissioner. The Court then reassessed compensation, accepting the employer's admission that the deceased earned Rs. 6,000 p.m., rather than the Rs. 150 per day originally applied. With a 50% deduction for family dependents' loss and a multiplier of 221.37, the Court awarded Rs. 6,64,110 plus 12% annual interest from one month after the accident.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Workmen's Compensation Labour Law Statutory Compensation Road Accidents Employment Law Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login