Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Sunday, 08 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-07-13 disposed

Maninderjit Singh Bitta vs Vijay Chhibber & Ors

Bench: 3 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

The Supreme Court heard contempt petitions alleging that M/s. Utsav Safety Systems Pvt. Ltd. violated Rule 50 of the Motor Vehicles Rules and Court orders by manufacturing High Security Registration Plates (HSRP) at unauthorized units in Assam through outsourcing, rather than at its approved Bilaspur facility. Over 5.7 million plates were manufactured without proper certification or control. Although the Court found a prima facie violation, it declined to initiate contempt proceedings against officials, given M/s. Utsav's undertaking to cease such practices. However, the Court issued detailed binding directions requiring strict compliance: manufacturers must not outsource core manufacturing; all processes must occur in approved facilities under direct control; testing agencies must inspect and certify plates before factory release; and States may independently pursue action for breach of contract.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Contempt of Court Motor Vehicles Administrative Law Public Interest Litigation Compliance and Implementation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login