Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-12-06 allowed

MANMOHAN NANDA vs UNITED INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR

Bench: 2 — Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, B.V. Nagarathna

In Brief

A 55-year-old man with diabetes obtained an overseas mediclaim policy and underwent required medical tests, all showing normal cardiac results. While traveling to the USA, he suffered a heart attack and received treatment costing approximately USD 241,932. The insurer repudiated the claim, alleging non-disclosure of hyperlipidemia (a pre-existing condition). The Supreme Court held the repudiation unlawful. The insured had disclosed his diabetes; the insurer, as a prudent insurer, examined the medical reports and issued the policy. Statins (prescribed preventively for diabetics) do not evidence pre-existing hyperlipidemia. The Court emphasized that cardiac events in diabetics are not automatically pre-existing conditions, and insurers cannot repudiate based on disclosed conditions they initially assessed and accepted. Exclusion clauses must be clear and are construed against the insurer.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insurance Law Consumer Protection Medical Insurance Non-disclosure Policy Repudiation Materiality of Facts Uberrima Fides Contra Proferentem Rule

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login