Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-11-26 dismissed

Manohar Lal Jat & Ors. etc vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. etc

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Manohar Lal Jat and others challenged a High Court judgment that allowed departmental promotees to be placed ahead of direct recruits in the seniority list under Rajasthan service rules. The Supreme Court held that seniority must be determined by the date of appointment under Rule 27, not the date of selection. The 2002 amendment's proviso to Rule 27 applies only when two selections are for the same category. Since this was the first recruitment to a newly created cadre with selections from different quotas, the proviso did not apply. The Court ruled that a proviso cannot override the main provision and cannot be applied retrospectively. The appeals were dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Service Rules Seniority Determination Departmental Promotion Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login