Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Thursday, 29 October 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-09-14 dismissed

Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate vs Union of India And Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The petitioner sought to challenge the allocation of funds by the Central Government to Jammu & Kashmir on various heads, contending it breached constitutional provisions and sought prosecution of officials under the Indian Penal Code and Prevention of Corruption Act. The Supreme Court held that fund allocation by the Centre to States for security purposes falls within the exclusive executive domain and is not subject to judicial review. The Court ruled that the PIL was not justiciable as budgetary and security decisions are not judicially manageable matters, and accordingly dismissed the petition.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Public Interest Litigation Judicial Review Executive Authority Separation of Powers Justiciability

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login