Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-03-05 partly_allowed

Manoj Suryavanshi vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bench: 3 — Uday Umesh Lalit, Indira Banerjee, M. R. Shah

In Brief

Three minor children aged 4, 6, and 8 years went missing after school in 2011. The accused, a labourer with a grudge against the father (whose brother had eloped with the accused's wife), was last seen with the children. Upon arrest, the accused led police to the bodies buried in a field. The Trial Court and High Court convicted him for murder and kidnapping, awarding death. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction based on compelling circumstantial evidence—last seen together, recovery of bodies, phone calls, and motive—but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment (no remission for 25 years) considering the accused's emotional disturbance, young age, no prior crimes, and family circumstances, holding that the rarest-of-rare standard for capital punishment was not met.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder Circumstantial Evidence Death Penalty Sentencing Child Killing Kidnapping

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login