Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2026-02-13 allowed

Manoj vs State of Maharashtra & Anr

Bench: 2 — B.V. Nagarathna, R. Mahadevan

In Brief

Manoj and Prakash were convicted and imprisoned for unlawfully possessing government-supplied cement meant for public works, allegedly to sell it at black-market rates. The Supreme Court set aside their conviction. Although the courts found they possessed diverted government cement without lawful authority, the Court held that since cement controls were withdrawn by March 1989—before the March 1994 alleged offence—there was no valid order under the Essential Commodities Act in force when the offence occurred. Without an operative statutory order, conviction under the Act was legally impermissible. The Court noted the investigating agency should have pursued Indian Penal Code charges instead.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Essential Commodities Act Criminal Law Statutory Interpretation Decontrol of Commodities Evidence and Procedure Public Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login