In Brief
The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case involving charges of assault, theft, attempted murder, and wildlife protection violations. The State opposed the petition. The Court found that the petitioner was not named in the FIR, was not the owner of recovered vehicles, expressed willingness to cooperate with police investigation, and had no other criminal involvement. The Court granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions that the petitioner join investigation when required, not leave India without permission, and not tamper with evidence.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.