Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-12-19 allowed

Mayankkumar Natwarlal Kankana Patel & Anr vs State of Gujarat and Anr

Bench: 2 — Vikram Nath, Augustine George Masih

In Brief

In this dowry death case, the deceased allegedly committed suicide in 2017. After the prosecution examined 21 witnesses, the State sought to examine the deceased's minor daughter—who was just 5 years old at the time—as a witness. The Trial Court refused, noting the child was never mentioned in the FIR or investigation, and over 7 years had passed. The High Court reversed this decision. The Supreme Court allowed the accused's appeal, holding that Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code (which permits recalling witnesses) must be used sparingly and only when evidence is indispensable. Here, the child's testimony was speculative, unreliable due to age and passage of time, and would unfairly delay trial and prejudice the accused. The Court restored the Trial Court's refusal to permit her examination.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Evidence Law Witness Examination Minor Witnesses Dowry Death Trial Practice Discretionary Powers of Court

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login