Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-10-21 allowed

MOHD. FIROZ vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Bench: 3 — Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, Bela M. Trivedi

In Brief

Mohd. Firoz, convicted of rape, child sexual abuse, and abduction, sought clarification of sentence imposed in the Supreme Court's 2022 judgment. The original judgment commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment for one offence but imposed 20 years rigorous imprisonment for another sexual offence, consciously avoiding life imprisonment for the remainder of natural life. However, related offences received life sentences meaning natural life imprisonment. The Court held that to maintain the internal consistency of its sentencing logic—balancing retributive and restorative justice—all related sexual offence convictions must be modified to uniform 20-year terms, not life imprisonment, thereby respecting the Court's deliberate judicial choice. Review petition allowed and sentences modified accordingly."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Sentencing Review Petition Child Sexual Abuse POCSO Act Rape and Sexual Offences Capital Punishment Mitigation Sentence Commensurateness

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login