In Brief
The Supreme Court set aside a conviction for possession of narcotic drugs (approximately 7.4 kg of opium) after the High Court had reversed an acquittal. The core issue was whether the prosecution adequately proved that the seized drugs were produced before the Magistrate and properly maintained in custody. The Court held that oral testimony alone, without documentary evidence (such as a Magistrate's order or Malkhana register entry), is insufficient to establish seizure and production of contraband under the NDPS Act. The appellant's acquittal was restored, emphasizing that appellate courts should not reverse acquittals based merely on differing reappreciation of evidence without substantial and compelling reasons.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.