Breaking Legal Update: Supreme Court Closes Chapter on Historic Bofors Payoff Case
New Delhi · Friday, 21 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-08 remanded

MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC THRU THE AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MS. NATALIA VORUZ vs NUZIVEEDU SEEDS LTD. THRU THE DIRECTOR

Bench: 2 — Rohinton Fali Nariman, Navin Sinha

In Brief

Monsanto Technology LLC sued Nuziveedu Seeds for patent infringement of a registered patent (No. 214436) covering genetically modified Bt cotton technology involving nucleic acid sequences (NAS). After a sub-licence agreement was terminated, the defendants countered that the patent was invalid under Section 3(j) of the Patents Act (plants excluded from patentability). While the Single Judge granted conditional injunction pending trial, the Division Bench summarily rejected the patent as unpatentable. The Supreme Court held that the Division Bench wrongly disposed the suit without evidence or expert testimony on complex biotechnological issues. The Court set aside the Division Bench order, restored the Single Judge's decision, and remanded the case for full trial on all issues of patentability, infringement, and other reliefs.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Intellectual Property Patent Law Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Genetic Engineering Civil Procedure Interim Injunction Summary Judgment

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login