Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2026-01-05 allowed

Motilal Oswal Financial Services Ltd vs Santosh Cordeiro and Anr

Bench: 2 — J. B. Pardiwala, K. V. Viswanathan

In Brief

A dispute arose between a financial services company and a property licensor over license fees and security deposit refund after the company vacated commercial premises in Mumbai. The licensor invoked an arbitration clause and sought appointment of an arbitrator under the Arbitration Act. The company objected, arguing that the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act gives exclusive jurisdiction to small causes courts for licensor-licensee disputes, making arbitration invalid. The Supreme Court held that courts reviewing arbitrator appointments need only verify an agreement exists—they cannot block arbitration based on a special statute's jurisdiction. Arbitrability questions must be decided by the arbitrator itself. The Court dismissed the appeal and directed arbitration to conclude within six months.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration and Conciliation Statutory Exclusive Jurisdiction Section 11 Arbitration Act Leave and Licence Agreement Competence-Competence Presidency Small Cause Courts Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login