Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-08-31 disposed

Mukesh Singh vs State (Narcotic Branch of Delhi)

Bench: 5 — Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee, Vineet Saran, M.R. Shah, S. Ravindra Bhat

In Brief

The Supreme Court examined whether investigations conducted by a police officer who is also the complainant are automatically vitiated. A bench of five judges held that the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 does not prohibit the informant from being the investigator. The Court found that mere apprehension of bias is insufficient; actual bias or prejudice must be proven and established. Each case must be decided on its individual facts and circumstances, not on universal generalization. The Court overruled Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab, which had held that such investigations are per se vitiated, but preserved the case-by-case approach from earlier decisions like V. Jayapaul and Bhaskar Ramappa Madar."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Criminal Procedure Investigation Bias and Impartiality Evidence Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login