Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-15 partly_allowed

Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs Dharma Properties Pvt. Ltd

Bench: 2 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

The Delhi Municipal Corporation issued a notice on March 25, 1998, dated to propose enhancement of property rateable value, but it was received only on April 4, 1998—after the end of the financial year. The Corporation used this notice to amend assessments for multiple years. The property owner challenged this, and lower courts held the notice time-barred. The Supreme Court held that 'giving' a notice requires actual receipt, not mere dispatch. Thus, the notice could not amend the 1997-98 assessment. However, the Court ruled that since the notice was received during the 1998-99 financial year, it validly amended assessments from April 1, 1998 onwards, provided amendments were completed within the three-year statutory period. The appeal was partly allowed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Municipal Law Property Tax Administrative Law Limitation Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login