Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-08-01 allowed

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI vs SURENDER SINGH

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi, A.S. Bopanna

In Brief

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi and the Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) had fixed a minimum qualifying mark of 89.25% for recruitment of Assistant Teachers. Two candidates who scored 87% and 88.75% respectively approached the High Court, which ordered their appointment despite falling below the cutoff. The Supreme Court set aside that order, holding that a recruiting authority cannot be compelled to fill vacant posts by appointing candidates who fail to meet prescribed minimum standards unless the cutoff is wholly irrational. The Court also held that candidates who knowingly participated in the selection process cannot later challenge the terms they knew about. The Court emphasised that maintaining quality standards in teacher recruitment is a legitimate employer interest."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Recruitment Public Service Judicial Review Contractual Rights

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login