Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-11-15 allowed

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI (MCGM) vs ABHILASH LAL

Bench: 3 — Rohinton Fali Nariman, S. Ravindra Bhat, Arun Mishra, Vineet Saran

In Brief

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) challenged a resolution plan approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, for Seven Hills Healthcare (a hospital company), claiming the plan impermissibly affected MCGM's property rights. MCGM owned land that Seven Hills was developing under contract. The Court held that the resolution plan could not be approved without compliance with the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, which requires express corporate permission for any dealings with municipal property. Since MCGM's formal approval was never obtained, the Court set aside the approvals and allowed the appeal, holding that Section 238 of the Code (which overrides other laws) cannot override a third party's statutory right to control its own property.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Public Law Administrative Law Municipal Corporation Property Rights Resolution Plans Code Supremacy Third-Party Rights

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login