Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-19 partly_allowed

Municipal Council Thanesar and Ors vs Virender Kumar and Ors

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit

In Brief

The Municipal Council of Thanesar auctioned shops and disputes arose over non-delivery of possession and non-payment of interest on advance rent and security. An arbitrator awarded 7% per annum interest on these amounts. When executing courts calculated this with quarterly compounding, the Council challenged it. The Supreme Court held that the award meant simple interest, not compound interest, since the award contained no explicit direction for compounding. Decree-holders retain their statutory right to post-award interest under Section 31(7)(b), but it must be calculated as simple interest at 7% per annum. The appeal was partly allowed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Execution of Decrees Interest Calculation Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Real Estate Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login