Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-02 dismissed

Murugan vs State of Tamil Nadu

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

Murugan was convicted of kidnapping and murder under Sections 364 and 302/34 IPC, based on circumstantial evidence that he and his cousin Kumar invited the deceased (Murugan's father) for dinner, where the deceased died that night. Kumar died before trial; the trial continued against Murugan. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding eight linked circumstances—including Kumar's motive (rejected marriage proposal), their common presence with the deceased until 11 PM, his immediate death thereafter, Kumar's confession, and recovery of the murder weapon—established guilt beyond doubt. The Court held that the co-accused's death does not affect prosecution of the other when common intention is proved, and that Murugan's failure to explain the circumstances or discredit witnesses confirmed guilt.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Circumstantial Evidence Murder Kidnapping Common Intention Section 34 IPC Concurrent Findings Article 136 Appeal

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login