Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2026-02-11 dismissed

N. Manoharan, Etc vs The Administrative Officer and Anr

Bench: 2 — Pankaj Mithal, S.V.N. Bhatti

In Brief

Retired employees of Heavy Water Plant (HWP), a unit of the Department of Atomic Energy, sought additional gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, claiming they were "employees" under that Act. The Supreme Court dismissed their appeals, upholding the High Court's decision. The Court held that since HWP employees are Central Government servants governed by Central Civil Services Pension Rules—which already provide gratuity—they fall within the statutory exclusion clause of Section 2(e) of the Gratuity Act. HWP is an ancillary unit of the Department, not a separate corporate entity, and employees cannot claim benefits under both schemes simultaneously.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Labour Law Gratuity Government Employees Atomic Energy Statutory Interpretation Exclusionary Clauses Administrative Law Employee Benefits

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login