Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 22 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-03-01 partly_allowed

N. Paraeswaran Unni vs G. Kannan and Another

Bench: 2 — N.V. Ramana

In Brief

The appellant lent Rs. 64,000 to the first respondent, who issued two cheques that were dishonoured for insufficiency of funds. The appellant sent a legal notice within 15 days of dishonour intimation, though it was initially returned with 'addressee absent'. A second notice was later sent. The High Court set aside the trial court's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, holding the notice period was exceeded. The Supreme Court held that when notice is sent by registered post to the correct address, service is deemed effective under the General Clauses Act and Indian Evidence Act, regardless of postal endorsement, and a reminder notice does not negate the first notice's validity. The Court set aside the High Court's judgment, directing the respondent to deposit Rs. 2,00,000 or face restoration of the conviction and three-month sentence.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Negotiable Instruments Cheque Dishonour Criminal Procedure Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login