In Brief
A filmmaker challenged the release of the documentary "An Insignificant Man," which contained a video clip of him. He argued that the film violated his constitutional rights under Articles 14 and 21, and sought to prevent its nationwide release. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, holding that Courts must be extremely reluctant to restrain creative works. Freedom of speech and expression is sacrosanct and should not be ordinarily interfered with. Artists have the freedom to express themselves in lawful ways, and limitations on artistic expression must be prescribed by law itself. The question of whether content could be used as evidence at trial is a matter for the trial court, not the Court at the injunction stage.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.