Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-03-19 allowed

NAND RAM(D) TH. LRS. vs JAGDISH PRASAD(D)TH.LRS

Bench: 2 — D. Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta

In Brief

Lessors sought possession of leased land from a tenant whose lease had expired by efflux of time on 23 September 1974. The tenant did not pay rent and refused to vacate. The High Court dismissed the suit as barred by limitation, relying on a 1961 finding from a Land Acquisition Court that the lease had terminated. The Supreme Court held that Article 67 of the Limitation Act applies to suits for possession after termination of tenancy, with a 12-year period commencing from the lease expiry date. The earlier court's finding was res judicata only on the compensation question, not on possession rights. The 1981 suit was within the limitation period. The tenant, being a tenant at sufferance, could not establish adverse possession without first surrendering the property. The Court allowed the appeal and decreed the suit."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Property Law Tenancy Limitation Law Land Acquisition Lease Adverse Possession Res Judicata Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login