Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-01-16 partly_allowed

NARA CHANDRABABU NAIDU vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR

Bench: 2 — Aniruddha Bose, Bela M. Trivedi

In Brief

The appellant, former Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, was implicated in a criminal case involving the alleged siphoning of Rs. 370 crores from a skill development project through shell companies. He challenged the FIR and remand order, arguing that the investigation violated Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, which requires prior approval from the government before investigating public servants for offences related to official decisions. A two-judge bench delivered split judgments. Justice Bose held Section 17A applies retroactively to ongoing investigations and the absence of prior approval renders PC Act proceedings illegal, though IPC proceedings may continue. Justice Trivedi held Section 17A applies only prospectively to offences amended in 2018, not to pre-amendment offences, and absence of approval does not vitiate proceedings. The matter was referred to the Chief Justice for constitution of a larger bench to resolve the conflicting interpretations.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Prevention of Corruption Criminal Procedure Public Servant Official Duty Section 17A PC Act Investigation Statutory Interpretation Retrospectivity Retroactivity

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login