Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-12-13 disposed

Narendra Kumar Hindal vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

A man whose wife died following allegedly negligent medical treatment challenged the acquittal of the doctor in the criminal case. The trial court had convicted the doctor under IPC Section 304-A (causing death by negligence), but the Sessions Court acquitted him. The complainant-husband had initially filed an appeal but withdrew it when the State also filed a petition seeking leave to appeal. When the State's petition was dismissed, the complainant was left without recourse. The Supreme Court held that a victim has an independent statutory right under the proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C., 1973 to appeal against acquittals, separate from the State's appeal rights. This right cannot be defeated by the dismissal of the State's petition. The Court allowed him to renew his appeal before the High Court.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Victim Rights Acquittal and Appeal Medico-Legal Cases Right of Appeal

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login