Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-04 dismissed

Narendra Kumar Srivastava vs State of Bihar & Ors

Bench: 2 — S. Abdul Nazeer

In Brief

This appeal concerns whether a private citizen can file a complaint for false evidence (Section 193 IPC) in court proceedings. The appellant, seeking Assured Career Progression pay benefits after administrative disputes, alleged that respondents had filed false affidavits in a High Court contempt proceeding. He filed a private complaint before a Magistrate. The Supreme Court held that Section 195(1)(b)(i) of the Criminal Procedure Code absolutely bars private complaints for false evidence in judicial proceedings. Prosecution can only be initiated by the court concerned through the procedure under Section 340 CrPC, after judicial discretion determines it is expedient for justice. The Magistrate erred in taking cognizance. Appeal dismissed; High Court's order quashing the complaint upheld.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure False Evidence Perjury Judicial Proceedings Criminal Cognizance Prosecution

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login