Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-01 allowed

Narendra Kumar Tiwari & Ors. etc vs State of Jharkhand & Ors. etc

Bench: 2 — Madan B. Lokur

In Brief

Irregularly appointed daily-wage workers of Jharkhand sought regularization after completing 10 years of service. The High Court denied regularization because they had not completed 10 years by the Umadevi cut-off date of 10th April 2006—impossible for Jharkhand, created in 2000. The Supreme Court held that regularization rules must be interpreted pragmatically, not rigidly. Employees completing 10 years by the date the Regularization Rules were promulgated are entitled to regularization unless there is misconduct or other valid objection. The strict temporal cut-off cannot render an entire state's regularization scheme meaningless, contrary to the constitutional objectives established in Umadevi.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Public Employment Labour Law Civil Service Regularization Administrative Law Constitutional Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login