Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-01-02 allowed

NARESH ANEJA @ NARESH KUMAR ANEJA vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR

Bench: 2 — C.T. Ravikumar, Sanjay Karol

In Brief

A company director was accused of sexual harassment and criminal intimidation. The High Court of Allahabad refused to quash the criminal proceedings. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that prima facie charges were not made out. The investigation and chargesheet lacked direct evidence of force or criminal intent, and the dispute was rooted in company finances rather than criminal conduct. The Court noted that statements under criminal procedure rules are inadmissible at this stage, and mere assertions without substantive evidence are insufficient. Proceedings against the appellant were quashed, but remained against the co-accused.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Sexual Harassment Criminal Intimidation Inherent Powers of High Court Prima Facie Case Quashing of Criminal Proceedings Constitutional Law - Gender Equality

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login