Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-07-21

Narinder Singh & Ors vs Divesh Bhutani & Ors

Bench: 3 — Abhay S. Oka

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that lands covered by special orders issued under Section 4 of the Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 (PLPA) constitute 'forest lands' within the meaning of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. As such, the State Government cannot permit non-forest use of these lands without prior Central Government approval. Once land is deemed forest land under the 1980 Act, its status persists regardless of whether the PLPA order expires. The Court directed authorities to remove illegal non-forest structures on such lands, but only after granting affected persons a hearing within three months. The decision clarifies that broad PLPA notifications alone do not make land 'forest', but specific Section 4 orders restricting activities like tree-cutting and quarrying do.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Environmental Law Forest Conservation Administrative Law Land Law Constitutional Law Environmental Rule of Law Sustainable Development

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login