In Brief
This review petition addressed whether a claim for damages arising from wildlife protection proceedings and land exclusion could benefit from Section 14 of the Limitation Act 1963 (which suspends the limitation period for successive proceedings on the same matter). The Court found that the current suit—seeking damages for losses from the statutory proceedings and exclusion—differed fundamentally from the earlier proceeding, which sought land exclusion from sanctuary protection and compensation. Since the matter-in-issue and relief were distinct, the Court held the appellant not entitled to the limitation benefit and dismissed the review petition, finding no error in the underlying judgment.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.