Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-22 partly_allowed

Nawaz vs State rep. by Inspector of Police

Bench: 2 — Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

In Brief

Ragila (Accused No. 1) and Nawaz (Accused No. 2) were convicted of murdering Ragila's husband under Section 302 IPC. The Supreme Court partly allowed their appeal, converting the conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC. The Court found that the deceased provoked the accused by calling them 'prostitute', depriving them of self-control and resulting in sudden grave provocation. The slap followed immediately by throttling constituted one continuous act. The Court upheld the conviction for concealing the body under Section 201 IPC. Both were sentenced to ten years rigorous imprisonment with concurrent sentences.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Homicide Provocation Extrajudicial Confession Evidence Criminal Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login