Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-04-09 dismissed

NEHA ENTERPRISES vs COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX,

Bench: 2 — Pankaj Mithal, S.V.N Bhatti

In Brief

A registered dealer under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 recorded sales of raw materials to manufacturer-exporters against Form-E (totalling Rs. 1,89,35,100) and claimed input tax credit of Rs. 6,42,260 on purchases. The assessing officer disallowed the credit, holding that sales exempt under section 7(c) of the Act (pursuant to notifications exempting such transactions) attract section 13(7), which prohibits input tax credit for exempt sales. The Supreme Court upheld the disallowance, holding that section 13(7) is a clear statutory prohibition: where sales are exempt under section 7(c), no input tax credit is available, regardless of policy intent behind the exemption notifications. The Court rejected the appellant's argument that denying input tax credit undermines the State's pro-exporter policy, emphasizing that tax and input tax credit entitlements are separate statutory concepts.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Taxation Value Added Tax Input Tax Credit Tax Exemption Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login