Breaking Constructive Criticism Essential for Democracy, but School Curricula Must Remain Fair and Verified: Supreme Court
New Delhi · Thursday, 24 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-10-26 allowed

Nekkanti Rama Lakshmi vs State of Karnataka and Anr

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

A man purchased land from a previous owner 7 years after a 1979 law prohibited transfers of certain granted lands to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The previous owner's son applied to restore the land 25 years after the law came into force. Lower courts allowed the application, but the Supreme Court reversed the decision, holding that although the law sets no express time limit, applications for land restoration must be made within a reasonable period. Waiting 25 years is unreasonable, making the claim liable to dismissal regardless of the absence of a statutory limitation period.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Law Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Protection Statutory Interpretation Limitation and Reasonableness

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login