Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-22 disposed

NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL vs ASSOCIATION OF CONCERNED CITIZENS OF NEW DELHI

Bench: 2 — A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

New Delhi Municipal Council challenged a Delhi High Court judgment striking down the 2009 Bye-laws that introduced Unit Area Method (UAM) for property tax assessment. The Bye-laws determined rateable value using fixed area values adjusted by factors for location, occupancy, age and use. The Supreme Court held the Bye-laws ultra vires Section 63 of the NDMC Act, 1994, which mandates rateable value be determined as 'annual rent at which property might reasonably be expected to let from year to year'—a rent-based methodology, not value-based. The UAM determines value of property, not rental value, and fundamentally differs from the statutory scheme. Although 95% of assessees accepted the Bye-laws and paid taxes voluntarily, the Court exercised powers under Article 142 to protect them from reassessment, while protecting writ petitioners' right to relief under the High Court's judgment.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Municipal Law Property Tax Delegated Legislation Ultra Vires Interpretation of Statutes Administrative Law Taxation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login