Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-01-08 allowed

NIGAM LTD. & ORS vs MB POWER (MADHYA PRADESH) LIMITED

Bench: 2 — B.R. Gavai, Prashant Kumar Mishra

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld the power of the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission to reject electricity bids not aligned to prevailing market prices under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003. MB Power, an unselected bidder in a 2013 competitive bidding process, sought mandamus via writ petition to force procurement of its 200 MW electricity at Rs.5.517/kWh. The Court held that: (1) the Electricity Act is an exhaustive statutory code; disputes must be resolved through constituted forums, not writ petitions absent extraordinary circumstances; (2) the Commission retains regulatory power under Section 86(1)(b) to examine market alignment of tariffs; (3) clause 5.15 of Bidding Guidelines permits selective rejection of non-market-aligned bids, not merely collective rejection; and (4) mandamus cannot compel a contract manifestly harmful to consumer interest. The High Court's judgment was quashed. All three appeals were allowed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Electricity Law Energy Procurement Administrative Law Tender and Contract Law Consumer Protection Regulatory Law Writ Jurisdiction Statutory Remedies Judicial Review Tariff Determination

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login